CHEMICAL RESISTANCE IWATE University Technical Report "Resistance to Acid Attack" Japan Xypex-treated mortar and untreated mortar were measured for acid resistance after exposure to a 5% H2SO4 solution for 100 days. A measurement of the corrosion ratio for the Xypex-treated sample was 0.117, while the untreated sample measured 0.210. Xypex suppressed concrete erosion to 1/8 of the reference samples. ASTM C 267 - 77 "Compressive Resistance to Mortars" Pacific Testing Labs, Seattle, USA Xypex-treated cylinders and untreated cylinders were exposed to hydrochloric acid, caustic soda, toluene, mineral oil, ethylene glycol, pool chlorine, brake fluid and other chemicals. Results indicated that chemical exposure did not have any detrimental effects on the Xypex coating. Tests following chemical exposure measured an average 17% higher compressive strength in the Xypex-treated specimens over the untreated samples. ASTM 672 "Standard Test Method for Scaling Resistance of Concrete Surfaces Exposed to De-icing Chemicals." Twin City Testing Lab, St. Paul, USA Xypex-treated samples restricted chloride ion concentration to below the level necessary to promote electrolytic corrosion of reinforcing steel. Visual examination of untreated panels after 50 freeze/thaw cycles showed a marked increase in surface deterioration compared to Xypex-treated samples. JIS "Chemical Durability Test" Japanese Utility Company, in-house Test Report, Tokyo, Japan. Concrete samples containing Xypex Admix were tested against five samples containing other admixtures and against a control sample, to determine resistance to corrosion and deterioration caused by contact with aggressive chemicals. All samples were soaked in a 5% sulfuric acid solution at 20C for six months. Various evaluations and measurements were assessed every month during the test period, including: Photographic comparisons, relative dynamic modulus elasticity, percentage change in length, weight and flexural rigidity. Although the Xypex Admix sample was subjected to acid conditions well outside its published range, the results confirmed Xypex with the best performance among the seven samples tested. "Sulfuric Acid Resistance Test" Aviles Engineering Corporation, Texas, USA Concrete samples containing Xypex Admix at different dosage rates (3%, 5% and 7%) were tested against untreated control samples for Sulfuric acid resistance. After immersion in the Sulfuric acid, each sample was tested for weight loss on a daily basis until a weight loss of 50% or a definite response trend was obtained. The percentage weight loss of the samples containing Xypex Admix tested significantly lower than the control samples. "Sulphate Resistance Test" Taywood Engineering Ltd. Perth, Australia. Xypex Admix-treated concrete samples were immersed in an ammonium-sulphate solution and tested for "resistance in a harsh environment". The performance of the Xypex-Crystalline-Technology was compared with five other concretes, including one containing a sulphate-resistant cement. Each of the test samples was cured for seven days and then placed in an ammonium-sulphate solution (132 g/l) for 180 days. The rate of corrosion was determined by measuring weight loss, and length change was noted on a weekly basis. The Xypex-Crystalline-Technology substantially improved concrete performance as compared to the reference concrete and tested very similar to the sulphate-resistant concrete. The Xypex Admix-treated samples also provided the highest level of protection as measured by change in length. FREEZE/THAW DURABILITY ASTM C 666 "Freeze/Thaw Durability" Independent Lab, Ohio, USA After 300 freeze/thaw cycles, the Xypex Admix-treated samples indicated 94% durability. ASTM C 672 "Standard Test Method for Scaling Resistance of Concrete Surfaces Exposed to De-icing Chemicals" Twin City Testing Lab, St. Paul, USA Xypex-treated samples restricted chloride ion concentration to below the level necessary to promote electrolytic corrosion of reinforcing steel. Visual examination of untreated panels after 50 freeze/thaw cycles showed a marked increase in surface deterioration compared to Xypex-treated samples. JIS A 6204 "Concrete Freeze/Thaw" Japan Building Material Test Center. The resonating frequency of both untreated and Xypex-treated concrete samples were measured throughout 435 freeze/thaw cycles. At 204 cycles, the Xypex-treated samples showed 96% relative durability compared to 90% in the untreated samples. At 435 cycles, the Xypex-treated samples measured 91% relative durability compared to 78% in the untreated samples. COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH ASTM C 39 "Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens" HBT Agra, Vancouver, Canada. Concrete samples containing Xypex Admix at various dosage rates (1%, 2% and 5%) were tested against an untreated concrete control sample. Compressive strength test results after 28 days indicated a significant strength increase in the samples incorporating Xypex Admix. The compressive strength increase varied between 5% and 20% (depending on the Xypex Admix dosage rate) over that of the reference sample. ASTM C 39 "Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens" Kleinfelder Labs, San Francisco, California, USA After 28 days, the compressive strength test of the concrete containing Xypex Admix measured 7160 psi as compared to the reference sample at 6460 psi (a 10% increase.) RADIATION RESISTANCE USA Standard No. N69 "Protective Coating for the Nuclear Industry" Pacific Testing Labs, Seattle, USA After exposure to 5.76 x 10-4 rads of gamma radiation, the Xypex treatment revealed no ill effects or damages.
For questions about concrete waterproofing, restoration, or corrosion control, send mail to Copyright © 2007 Guaranteed Waterproofing & Construction |